Editorial Standards & Principles
At Dietplanningmeetings, we are committed to delivering accurate, evidence-based information about nutrition and healthy living. Our editorial process reflects rigorous fact-checking, transparent sourcing, and a dedication to serving readers with integrity.
Our Commitment
We publish nutrition information that is honest, well-researched, and free from commercial bias. Every article reflects the knowledge of qualified experts and current scientific understanding.
Our Editorial Principles
Accuracy First
Every fact is verified against peer-reviewed research, official health guidelines, and expert consensus. We correct errors promptly and transparently when they are identified.
Editorial Independence
Our content is written and reviewed by our editorial team without influence from advertisers, product manufacturers, or external commercial interests.
Complete Transparency
We disclose our sources, cite research, and explain the methodology behind our recommendations. Readers always know where information comes from.
Expert Authorship
Articles are written and reviewed by nutrition professionals, registered dietitians, and scientists with verifiable credentials in their field.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Research & Source Verification
Authors begin with peer-reviewed studies, official health guidelines (WHO, EU nutrition standards), and consultation with subject-matter experts. All sources are documented.
Editorial Review
A second editor reviews the draft for accuracy, clarity, and adherence to editorial standards. Technical claims are cross-checked against cited sources.
Expert Consultation
Articles on complex topics are reviewed by external nutrition specialists or researchers to ensure scientific accuracy and current best practices.
Publication & Monitoring
After publication, we monitor new research and reader feedback. If significant updates emerge, articles are revised with clear notation of changes made.
Our Editorial Team
Our content is developed by experienced nutrition professionals and reviewed by a network of qualified experts. Each team member brings deep expertise and a commitment to evidence-based information.
Elena Nováková
Senior Nutrition Editor
Registered Dietitian with 12 years of experience in clinical nutrition and public health. Holds a Master's degree in Nutritional Science and regularly reviews emerging research in dietary guidelines.
Prague, Czech Republic
Prof. Martin Svoboda
Research & Science Editor
Ph.D. in Food Science and Nutrition. Former university lecturer and active researcher with publications in peer-reviewed journals. Ensures all content meets rigorous scientific standards.
Brno, Czech Republic
Zuzana Králová
Content & Editorial Lead
Certified nutrition communicator with 8 years translating complex research into clear, accessible content. Oversees editorial consistency, fact-checking coordination, and quality assurance.
Brno, Czech Republic
Advisory Board
Our editorial work is informed by an advisory board of independent experts from leading health and nutrition organizations across the Czech Republic and Europe. Members review high-impact articles and provide guidance on emerging topics.
Advisory board members are selected for their expertise, publication record, and commitment to advancing nutrition science communication. We maintain a transparent conflict-of-interest policy to preserve editorial independence.
Corrections & Updates Policy
How We Handle Corrections
We acknowledge that despite careful fact-checking, errors may occur. When a factual mistake is identified, we correct it promptly and clearly. All corrections are marked with a note indicating what was changed and when.
Readers who spot an error are encouraged to contact our editorial team at [email protected] with details. We review all submissions within 48 hours and respond to the reader directly.
Article Updates & Revisions
Nutrition science evolves. When new research substantially changes our understanding of a topic, we update articles to reflect current evidence. Major updates include a note at the top of the article explaining what changed and why.
Minor clarifications (improved wording, additional references) are made without notice. Substantive fact changes always receive an update note visible to readers.
Retraction Policy
In rare cases where an article contains fundamental errors that cannot be corrected, or if we determine the article no longer reflects accepted evidence, we may retract it entirely. Retracted articles remain accessible with a clear retraction notice explaining the reason.
Retractions are exceptional and reflect our commitment to reader trust and scientific integrity.
How to Report an Issue
Found a factual error, outdated information, or have a question about our sources? We welcome your feedback.
Email us:
Please include: the article title, the specific claim you question, and ideally a link to the source or research you're referencing. We respond to all substantive submissions.
Transparency in Sources
Every article includes citations and references. Readers can trace our claims back to original sources. We cite:
- Peer-reviewed scientific studies (with DOI or journal reference)
- Government and institutional guidelines (WHO, EMA, national health authorities)
- Expert consensus statements and reviews
- Interviews and quotes from qualified professionals
We avoid citing commercial websites, anecdotal claims, or sources without expert credentials.
Scope & Limitations
Educational Purpose: All content on Dietplanningmeetings is for informational and educational purposes. We provide evidence-based information about nutrition, healthy eating habits, and lifestyle factors that support well-being.
Not Personal Advice: Our articles are general information and do not replace personalized guidance from a qualified nutrition professional. Individual needs vary based on health status, genetics, lifestyle, and medications.
Individual Variation: Nutrition recommendations in our articles reflect scientific consensus, but individual responses to dietary changes differ. Readers should consult their own healthcare providers before making significant dietary changes.
Regional Context: While we focus on Czech and European nutrition standards, some guidance may need local adaptation depending on available foods, cultural preferences, and regional guidelines.
For our complete terms, privacy practices, and full disclaimer, please see our Disclaimer page.
Have Questions About Our Standards?
Our editorial team values reader engagement and feedback. If you have questions about our process, want to suggest a topic, or have concerns about accuracy, we'd like to hear from you.